Clinical Justification: Why REMUV Should Become a Post-Surgical Best Practice
- CEGA
- Mar 25
- 1 min read
Literature Supporting the Necessity of REMUV
(a) Hemodynamic Stability in Surgery
Avoiding patient movement post-surgery is critical in preventing complications such as hypotension and cardiac instability (Perel, A., et al., Anesthesiology, 2018).
Tipping and repositioning patients post-surgery has been linked to increased risks of hemodynamic decompensation (Wilson, M., et al., Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 2020).
CEGA’s device prevents unnecessary repositioning, reducing postoperative cardiovascular instability.
Maintaining hemodynamic stability during patient transfers is crucial to prevent complications such as hypotension and shock. CEGA's REMUV system is specifically designed to minimize movement-induced stress, supporting better patient outcomes (cegaco.com).
(b) Bleeding Risk & Prevention of Pressure on Surgical Sites
Even minor movement of a patient post-surgery can disrupt clot formation, leading to increased bleeding and prolonged recovery time (Chang, J., et al., Surgery, 2021).
CEGA’s no-touch removal prevents unnecessary pressure on surgical sites, aligning with clinical efforts to minimize iatrogenic bleeding risk.
(c) Infection Risk Reduction via Reduced Bleeding
Postoperative bleeding increases infection risk by creating a bacterial growth medium at surgical sites (Nguyen, T., et al., Journal of Surgical Infections, 2019).
Reducing bleeding directly lowers infection rates, leading to better patient outcomes and lower hospital-acquired infection costs.
CEGA’s method minimizes bleeding risk, which in turn reduces post-op infection risk.
CEGA's REMUV system incorporates features that reduce the risk of cross-contamination during patient transfers, addressing critical infection control concerns in healthcare settings (cegaco.com).
Key Point: CEGA’s technology aligns with widely accepted surgical risk mitigation strategies, making it a logical Best Practice candidate.
Comments